|
Post by neila on Mar 18, 2024 7:37:53 GMT
Week 15: To follow
|
|
|
Post by neila on Mar 18, 2024 7:38:06 GMT
Week 16: To follow
|
|
|
Post by neila on Mar 18, 2024 7:39:16 GMT
The feedback from the scoresheets for the KO CUP RD 2/PLATE RD 1 was as follows:
SCORES:
Winners:
9: Carleton Grangers, Olde Taverners
8: Kippax Legionnaires, Olde Tavern Allsorts
7: Featherstone Phoenix
Non-winners:
8: Golden Lion Dudes, Kippax British Legion
7: Flanagan’s Army, The Vic
COMMENTS:
Carleton Grangers: Very good (mixture of accessible and difficult questions).
Kippax British Legion: Very good.
Kippax Legionnaires: More opera, please!
Flanagan’s Army: Less opera, please!
Featherstone Phoenix: Opera again!!!
Olde Taverners: Very good quiz, interesting rounds, balanced questions.
[Balanced questions indeed, as the usual measurement reveals that each team received 6 questions that neither team could answer.]
Golden Lion Dudes: Not too bad.
Neil.
|
|
|
Post by neila on Mar 18, 2024 7:39:39 GMT
Week 17: To follow
|
|
|
Post by neila on Mar 18, 2024 7:40:08 GMT
Week 18: To follow
|
|
|
Post by neila on Mar 18, 2024 8:45:42 GMT
The feedback from the scoresheets for WEEK 19 was as follows:
SCORES:
Winners:
9: Lofthouse Lions
8: Carleton Grangers, Kippax British Legion, Kippax Legionnaires
7: Golden Lion Dudes
Non-winners:
9: Olde Taverners
7: The Other Team
6: Flanagan’s Army
3: Featherstone Phoenix
COMMENTS:
Featherstone Phoenix: Too highbrow – no science, music, sport etc.
[Though we did have ‘Trees and plants’, which is at least natural science.]
Carleton Grangers: Good quiz – enjoyable.
Kippax British Legion: Very good.
STATISTICS:
Two answers were not got by anyone in the FTQL (though only two Division One matches had the chance):
Tony Kushner (Dramatist with whom Spielberg co-wrote ‘The Fabelmans’)
Petiole (Small stalk that attaches leaf to a stem)
Neil.
|
|
|
Post by neila on Mar 25, 2024 11:29:28 GMT
The feedback from the scoresheets for WEEK 20 was as follows:
SCORES:
Winners:
8: Carleton Grangers, Olde Taverners 7: Golden Lion Dudes, Kippax Legionnaires
Non-winners:
8: Featherstone Phoenix 7: The Other Team, The Vic 6: Kippax British Legion, Olde Tavern Allsorts
COMMENTS:
Carleton Grangers: Excellent atmosphere. Good mix. The Other Team: Fair quiz.
Olde Taverners: Well balanced but tougher than usual. Lots of Passovers in the Judaism round. [Haha.]
Featherstone Phoenix: Much better and more varied.
Golden Lion Dudes: OK.
STATISTICS:
The numbers of questions remaining unanswered (by either team) in rounds 1/2/4/7/9/10 were as follows (in the 5 matches, expressed as A-B):
Division 1: 7-5 9-5 16-10 (Total)
Division 2: 4-2 5-3 6-5 15-10 (Total)
Despite the above comment (by a team playing A), there appears to have been a slight imbalance against A, with every match showing it.
Split by rounds instead of matches, the same unanswered questions break down as:
6-5 (Mountains) 5-1 (Pop music albums) 2-3 (Metals) 4-4 (British political history) 6-2 (Food and drink) 8-5 (Judaism)
There were seven answers not got by anyone in the FTQL, though (as is often the case) they were only in Div 1’s quiz as they were all at position 4. Furthermore, three Div 1 teams including Lofthouse, were not playing. They were:
Duarte (Highest peak in Caribbean) Schiehallion (Used to estimate mass of Earth in 1774) Albert Stubbins (Only footballer on Sergeant Pepper cover) Gerald Nabarro (Politician in sensational 1971 trial after driving wrong way round roundabout) Careme (French chef regarded as haute cuisine founder) Shiva (Period of mourning in Judaism for close relative) Mezuzah (Parchment on doorframe of Jewish homes)
Neil.
|
|
|
Post by neila on Jun 3, 2024 3:41:47 GMT
Week 21: To follow
|
|
|
Post by neila on Jun 3, 2024 3:43:25 GMT
The feedback from the scoresheets for the KO CUP/PLATE SEMI-FINALS was as follows:
SCORES:
Winners:
9: Lofthouse Lions
8: Carleton Grangers, Kippax Legionnaires
Non-winners:
8: Featherstone Phoenix, Olde Taverners
7: Olde Tavern Allsorts, The Vic
COMMENTS:
Carleton Grangers: V good game. Mixture of v easy + a few difficult ones.
Featherstone Phoenix: Good mix of questions.
Neil.
|
|
|
Post by neila on Jun 3, 2024 5:52:12 GMT
The feedback from the scoresheets for the HANDICAP CUP RD 1 was as follows:
SCORES:
Winners:
10: Lofthouse Lions 8: Carleton Grangers, Kippax Legionnaires 7: Olde Tavern Allsorts, Olde Taverners, The Vic
Non-winners:
6: Kippax British Legion, The Other Team 5: Flanagan’s Army 4: Featherstone Phoenix 3: Golden Lion Dudes
COMMENTS:
Lofthouse Lions: Excellent. [The Lions correctly answered every team question that went to them (own question or passover) and scored 10/10 in both written rounds. But does that make it an excellent quiz from their point of view, or should there be some questions that even they don’t get?] Golden Lion Dudes: Heavily weighted to Team A with easier questions. Was not Division 2 level questions. Need rooms to play in that are quiet. If those are the level of Division 2 questions you’ll lose 2 players at least. [As the same questions went to all teams, I suppose they were meant to be pitched somewhere between Division 1 and 2.]
Featherstone Phoenix: Seemed D1 level. Olde Taverners: Good rounds, a bit unbalanced and the A1 Jazz question was incredibly obscure. [This asked for the nickname shared by saxophonists Edward Stitt and Theodore Walter Rollins, the answer being Sonny. This question was actually answered correctly in all the other matches, though more often as a passover. Perhaps the name ‘Sonny’ Rollins (still alive at 93) rang a bell here.]
The Other Team: Too much like University Challenge questions!! Olde Tavern Allsorts: OK, but am guessing Round 2 favoured ‘B’ and Round 4 favoured ‘A’. [See below for the answer to this.]
Carleton Grangers: Mixture of accessible and tough questions. Thanks, King’s Arms.
STATISTICS:
The numbers of questions remaining unanswered (by either team) in rounds 1/2/4/7/9/10 were as follows (in the 6 matches, expressed as A-B):
0-0 3-2 4-1 3-4 5-3 5-4 20-14 (Total) So there does seem to be a favouring of ‘B’, with 4 out of 6 matches showing it. Split by rounds instead of matches, the same unanswered questions break down as: 5-2 (Animals in literature) 3-2 (Jazz) 0-1 (Revolts and rebellions) 3-1 (Companies & brands) 0-3 (Cities) 9-5 (Space)
Again, a favouring towards ‘B’ is shown on 4 out of 6 occasions. The Allsorts were right about Round 2 (Jazz) favouring ‘B’ and Round 4 (Revolts and rebellions) favouring ‘A’, but in fact these 2 rounds showed the most even balance of the 6.
Finally, as already indicated by the note on Lofthouse Lions’ performance, there were no answers that defeated the entire FTQL! Neil.
|
|
|
Post by neila on Aug 18, 2024 16:48:07 GMT
The feedback from the scoresheets for the HANDICAP CUP RD 2 was as follows:
SCORES:
Winners:
8: Olde Taverners 7: Carleton Grangers, Olde Tavern Allsorts
Non-winners:
9: Lofthouse Lions 7: The Vic
COMMENTS:
Olde Taverners: Good rounds, evenly balanced. [See below for a balance analysis.] Lofthouse Lions: Good spread.
Carleton Grangers (v The Vic): Good game. Good spirit.
STATISTICS:
The numbers of questions remaining unanswered (by either team) in rounds 1/2/4/7/9/10 were as follows (in the 3 matches, expressed as A-B):
5-0 2-2 0-1 7-3 (Total) So there was a notable imbalance in just one match, though this wasn’t the match where the ‘evenly balanced’ comment was made.
And there were no answers that were not got by anyone on the night. Neil.
|
|
|
Post by neila on Aug 18, 2024 16:49:38 GMT
The feedback from the scoresheets for the HANDICAP CUP SEMI-FINALS was as follows:
SCORES:
Winners:
8: Carleton Grangers 7: Olde Tavern Allsorts
Non-winners:
9: Olde Taverners 7: The Vic
COMMENTS:
Carleton Grangers: Excellent SF. Great opponents. Olde Taverners: Good rounds, good questions, evenly balanced. [See below for a balance analysis.]
STATISTICS:
The numbers of questions remaining unanswered (by either team) in rounds 1/2/4/7/9/10 were as follows (in the 2 matches, expressed as A-B):
3-1 1-1 4-2 (Total) The ‘evenly balanced’ comment was made in the match that was 1-1 above, so was spot on in the context of that match.
The A4 question in round 7 was not got in either match (I haven’t got the detail of the question available). Neil.
|
|
|
Post by neila on Aug 18, 2024 16:50:47 GMT
The feedback from the scoresheet for the HANDICAP CUP FINAL was as follows:
SCORES:
Winners:
8: Carleton Grangers
Non-winners:
7: Olde Tavern Allsorts
COMMENTS:
Carleton Grangers: Good standard for a final. Neil.
|
|
|
Post by neila on Sept 16, 2024 4:45:38 GMT
The feedback from the scoresheets for the KO CUP/PLATE FINALS was as follows:
SCORES:
Winners:
9: Lofthouse Lions 8: Carleton Grangers
Non-winners:
8: Kippax Legionnaires
There were no comments.
Neil.
|
|